It’s a pleasure to be an institution where students are active in creating links between the community and the school and opportunities to learn. Here are two events coming up.
OCTOBER 24: A Dialogue About “Honour Killings” in Canada
Brought to you by Osgoode’s: Muslim Law Students’ Association, South Asian Law Students’ Association, and Women’s Caucus
What are ‘honour killings? • Are ‘honour killings’ different from other forms of violence against women? If so , how? • Have ‘honour killings been discussed accurately and fairly in the media? • Should there be a specific Criminal Code provision to address ‘honour killings? Why or why not? • And more
Panelists: Deepa Mattoo (Staff Lawyer, South Asian Legal Clinic of Ontario) •Kripa Sekhar (Executive Director, South Asian Women’s Centre) •Nader Hasan (Partner, Ruby Shiller Chan Hasan LLP)
Refreshments Provided. Poster here. OCT 24 @ 12:30 IKB 2001
OCTOBER 31: Gladue & Sentencing
Please join the Osgoode Indigenous Students Association (find them on Facebook here) to hear from Jennifer Bolton, a Gladue Caseworker from Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto, who will be speaking to faculty and students on Gladue sentencing principles.
Wednesday, October 31, 2012 12:30-2:00 Room 2010 Lunch will be provided
Who Should Attend: This event will benefit faculty and students interested in criminal law and Aboriginal law, sentencing, equity, equality, criminology. .
The Supreme Court of Canada in a landmark decision called R v Gladue(http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1999/1999canlii679/1999canlii679.html) held that a court must take into consideration alternatives to incarceration with respect to Aboriginal offenders during sentencing. The court made the following comment at paragraph 64 after reviewing the statistics of Aboriginal peoples in custody:
These findings cry out for recognition of the magnitude and gravity of the problem, and for responses to alleviate it. The figures are stark and reflect what may fairly be termed a crisis in the Canadian criminal justice system. The drastic overrepresentation of aboriginal peoples within both the Canadian prison population and the criminal justice system reveals a sad and pressing social problem. It is reasonable to assume that Parliament, in singling out aboriginal offenders for distinct sentencing treatment in s. 718.2(e), intended to attempt to redress this social problem to some degree. The provision may properly be seen as Parliament’s direction to members of the judiciary to inquire into the causes of the problem and to endeavour to remedy it, to the extent that a remedy is possible through the sentencing process.
Since the Supreme Court’s judgment, Gladue principles have not been consistently applied in courts. Recently, in March 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada in R v. Ipeelee (http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc13/2012scc13.html) confirmed Gladue principles and held that the failure to apply these principles “would run afoul of this statutory obligation. Furthermore, the failure to apply the Gladue principles in any case would also result in a sentence that is not fit and is not consistent with the fundamental principle of proportionality. Therefore, application of the Gladue principles is required in every case involving an Aboriginal offender, including the breach of an LTSO, and a failure to do so constitutes an error justifying appellate intervention.”