cfjp || pcjf

road stretching away to horizon. lettering in bottom right Canadian feminist judgments project | Projet canadien de jugements féministes

Questions: Email Professor Van Wagner

BIBLIOGRAPHY

FJP Projects

Crawford, Bridget J & Anthony C Infanti, eds. Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017).

 

Douglas, Heather et al., eds, Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law (London: Hart Publishing, 2014).

 

Enright, Máiréad, Julie McCandless & Aoife O’Donoghue, eds. Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity (Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing, 2017).

 

Hunter, Rosemary, Clare McGlynn & Erika Rackley, eds. Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice (Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing, 2010).

 

McDonald, Elisabeth et al., eds, Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand: Te Rino: A Two-Stranded Rope (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017).

 

Revisiting Equality [Special Issue] (2006) 18:1 CJWL 1.

 

Stanchi, Kathryn M, Linda L Berger & Bridget J Crawford, eds. Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016).

 

FJP Websites

“Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project”, online: Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project <http://www.feministjudging.ie/>.

 

“Scottish Feminist Judgments Project”, online: <https://www.sfjp.law.ed.ac.uk/>.

 

 “The African Feminist Judgments Project”, online: Cardiff Law and Global Justice <https://www.lawandglobaljustice.com/the-african-feminist-judgments-project>.

 

“The Indian Feminist Judgment Project | OHRH”, online: <http://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/the-indian-feminist-judgment-project/>.

 

“The U.S. Feminist Judgments Project”, online: The US Feminist Judgments Project <https://sites.temple.edu/usfeministjudgments/>.

 

“Women’s Court of Canada”, online: <www.womenscourt.ca>.

 

Judgments [sampling]

 

Barker, Nicola J. Rethinking Conjugality as the Basis for Family Recognition: A Feminist Rewriting of the Judgment in <Em>Burden v. United Kingdom</Em>, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2890989 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2016).

 

Buckley, Melina. Women’s Court of Canada Act and Rules, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3244347 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2018).

 

Duggan, Marian & Julie McCandless. “Right Thinking People” and Suffering Through the Politics of Difference in Northern Ireland: A Feminist Judgment, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2702163 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2015).

 

Eberts, Mary, Sharon McIvor & Teressa Nahanee. “Native Women’s Association of Canada v. Canada Special Issue/Numero Special – Rewriting Equality/Recrire l’Egalite: Judgments/Jugements” (2006) 18 Can J Women & L 67, online: <https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/cajwol18&i=71>.

 

Fletcher, Ruth. Attorney General v X and Others (1992): An Imagined Feminist Judgment, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2694351 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2015).

 

Koshan, Jennifer. Marriage and Advance Consent to Sex: A Feminist Judgment in R v. JA, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2891024 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2016).

 

Koshan, Jennifer. “Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. N.A.P.E. Special Issue/Numero Special – Rewriting Equality/Recrire l’Egalite: Judgments/Jugements” (2006) 18 Can J Women & L 321, online: <https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/cajwol18&i=325>.

 

Thornton, Liam. MhicMathúna v Ireland, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2705448 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2015).

 

Journal Articles

 

Aotearoa New Zealand

McDonald, Elisabeth & Paulette Benton-Greig. Accessing Court Files as a Feminist Endeavour: Reflections on ‘Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa — Te Rino: A Two-Stranded Rope’, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3178159 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2018).

 

Australia

Stanchi, Kathryn M, Bridget J Crawford & Linda L Berger. “The Necessity of Multi-Stranded Feminist Judicial Opinions” (2018) 44:2 Australian Feminist Law Journal 245, online: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2018.1547103>.

 

Canada

Koshan, Jennifer. Impact of the Feminist Judgment Writing Projects: The Case of the Women’s Court of Canada, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3285082 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2018).

Majury, Diana. “Introducing the Women’s Court of Canada” (2006) 18 Can J Women & L 1, online: <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cajwol18&id=5&div=&collection=journals>.

 

Réaume, Denise. “Turning Feminist Judgments into Jurisprudence: The Women’s Court of Canada on Substantive Equality” (2017) 8:9 Oñati Socio-Legal Series 1307, online: <http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/958>.

 

Scotland

Cowan, Sharon. “The Scottish Feminist Judgments Project: A New Frontier” (2018), online: <https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3249609>.

 

US

Crawford, Bridget J & Anthony C Infanti. “Introduction to Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions” (2017), online: <https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2951327>.

 

Crawford, Bridget. “Feminist Judging Matters: How Feminist Theory and Methods Affect the Process of Judgment” (2018) Pace Law Faculty Publications, online: <https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/1089>.

 

UK

Rackley, Erika. “How feminism could improve judicial decision-making”, the Guardian (11 November 2010), online: <http://www.theguardian.com/law/2010/nov/11/feminism-improve-judicial-decision-making>.

 

———. “Why Feminist Legal Scholars Should Write Judgments: Reflections on the Feminist Judgments Project in England and Wales” (2012) 24 Can J Women & L 389, online: <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cajwol24&id=413&div=&collection=journals>.

 

International

Berger, Linda L, Bridget J Crawford & Kathryn M Stanchi. “Feminist Judgments: Comparative Socio-Legal Perspectives on Judicial Decision Making and Gender Justice” (2018) 8:9 Oñati Socio-Legal Series 1215, online: <http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/1104>.

 

Hodson, Loveday. Collaboration as Feminist Methodology: Experiences from the Feminist International Judgments Project, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3266490 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2018).

 

Other

Auchmuty, Rosemary. “Using Feminist Judgments in the Property Law Classroom” (2012) 46:3 The Law Teacher 227, online: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03069400.2012.732375>.

 

Davies, Margaret. “The Law Becomes Us: Rediscovering Judgment” (2012) 20:2 Fem Leg Stud 167, online: <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10691-012-9204-y>.

 

Drakopoulou, Maria. “Revisiting Feminist Jurisprudence: A Rehabilitation” (2013) 3:2 feminists@law, online: <https://journals.kent.ac.uk/index.php/feministsatlaw/article/view/90>.

 

Grear, Anna. “Learning Legal Reasoning While Rejecting the Oxymoronic Status of Feminist Judicial Rationalities: A View From the Law Classroom” (2012) 46:3 The Law Teacher 239, online: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2012.737251>.

 

Hunter, Caroline & Ben Fitzpatrick. “Feminist judging and legal theory” (2012) 46:3 The Law Teacher 255, online: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2012.737250>.

 

Hunter, Rosemary. “Can Feminist Judges Make a Difference” (2008) 15 Int’l J Legal Prof 7, online: <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/injlepro15&id=7&div=&collection=journals>.

 

———. “Introduction: feminist judgments as teaching resources” (2012) 46:3 The Law Teacher 214, online: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2012.732364>.

 

———. “The Power of Feminist Judgments?” (2012) 20:2 Fem Leg Stud 135, online: <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10691-012-9202-0>.

 

Hunter, Rosemary. Feminist Judging in the ‘Real World’, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3198259 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2018).

 

Reviewed

Brooks, Kim. “Review of Crawford & Infanti (2017) ‘Will Feminist Judges Really Make a Difference?’”, (18 February 2019), online: Equality <https://equality.jotwell.com/will-feminist-judges-really-make-a-difference/>.

 

Davies, Margaret. “Review of Hunter, McGlynn and Rackley: Feminist Judgments”, (20 February 2012), online: Equality <https://equality.jotwell.com/feminist-judgments/>.

 

Roberts, Heather & Laura Sweeney. Review Essay: Why (Re)Write Judgments?, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2700494 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2015).